What filing or record-keeping practice supports preventing tampering?

• A. Keeping a simple inventory by only the maintenance supervisor
• B. Maintaining an inspection log with regular checks
• C. Not recording inspections to avoid paperwork
• D. Documenting only after a failure

Answer: (B)

Maintaining an ongoing, verifiable record of what’s been checked and when creates a transparent trail that helps prevent tampering. An inspection log with regular checks captures key details every time an extinguisher is inspected: the date and time, who performed the check (signature or initials), what was inspected, the results, and any needed actions taken. This builds accountability and makes it hard to alter history without leaving a trace, because there’s a consistent sequence of entries and responsible personnel attached to each entry. If someone tried to tamper with the record, the gaps, mismatched dates, or missing signatures would stand out, signaling that the record isn’t trustworthy.

In contrast, keeping only a simple inventory controlled by one person lacks independent verification, so it’s easier to modify or hide issues. Not recording inspections at all provides no evidence that maintenance happened, defeating tamper-evidence and compliance. Documenting only after a failure is reactive and misses the proactive checks that prevent problems from occurring in the first place.

So, a regularly updated inspection log is the best practice for deterring tampering and ensuring ongoing maintenance.